Environment › Environmental law and institutions
Rivers: sharing, linking and disputes
How India shares its rivers: disputes between States and how they are settled, river linking, and rivers shared with neighbouring countries. It serves GS1 answers on resources and GS2 answers on federalism.
All 8 subjects shown; the 0 that changed from 1 to 15 July 2026 are marked.Show only these
The Sone agreement
Copy link to The Sone agreementPrelims and Mains
A quarter century of argument over the Sone has ended in a signature rather than in a tribunal. The Constitution offers States both routes, and which one they take decides how long the water stays unshared.
- Article 262 lets Parliament provide by law for deciding disputes over interstate river waters, and keep the courts out of them.
- The Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 is that law, under which the Centre constitutes a tribunal when a State asks for one.
- States may instead settle by negotiated agreement, which binds them without any tribunal at all.
- Bihar and Jharkhand signed a memorandum of understanding dividing the Sone's water, ending a dispute open since Jharkhand was carved out in 2000.
- Bihar takes 5.75 million acre-feet and Jharkhand 2, from the 7.75 undivided Bihar held under the Bansagar Agreement of 1973.
- The Sone rises near Amarkantak in Madhya Pradesh and joins the Ganga near Patna as a right bank tributary.
What changed
River linking
Copy link to River linkingPrelims and Mains
- Inter-basin transfer
- Carrying water from the catchment of one river to that of another, the idea on which river linking rests.
The Home Minister has offered river linking as the answer that could keep India free of water shortage for a century. Every link is an inter-basin transfer, and the objection is that moving water to a basin in deficit creates a fresh claimant on water that already has users.
- The links are proposed under the National Perspective Plan of 1980 and worked up by the National Water Development Agency.
- A receiving region may demand its transferred water even in a distress year, at the cost of the original users.
- Tamil Nadu's requests for tribunals on the Pennaiyar in November 2019 and on Mekedatu in March 2026 are unanswered, one despite a Supreme Court direction.
- Demand side management is the alternative: conserve, reward efficient farm use, and curb groundwater drawn on free power.
- Ken-Betwa is the first link to be built, a 231 km canal carrying Ken water to the Betwa, with the Daudhan dam inside Panna Tiger Reserve.
- Ten villages will be submerged and twelve more displaced for compensatory afforestation.
- Adivasis in Chhatarpur allege eviction before compensation and irregular gram sabha consent.
What changed
3 Sep 2026
The Hindu, 3 Sep 2026: River-linking is not the solution (opens in a new tab)
18 Aug 2026
22 Jul 2026Updatealso in news
- Madhya Pradesh ordered an inquiry into compensation and gram sabha proceedings for families displaced by the Ken-Betwa link. Separately, the Kosi-Mechi link within Bihar has been taken up under the Accelerated Irrigation Benefit Programme, to finish by March 2029.
The Indian Express, 22 Jul 2026: Madhya Pradesh orders an inquiry into rehabilitation under the Ken Betwa link project (opens in a new tab) · PIB, 27 Jul 2026: KOSI-MECHI INTRA-STATE LINK PROJECT (opens in a new tab)
The Brahmaputra and China
Copy link to The Brahmaputra and ChinaPrelims and Mains
- Expert Level Mechanism
- The India China body set up in 2006 for talks on shared rivers, under which China passes flood season data to India.
- UN Watercourses Convention
- The 1997 United Nations treaty on shared rivers, requiring equitable use, no significant harm, and prior notice of works planned upstream.
The Brahmaputra is the Yarlung Tsangpo in Tibet, so India and Bangladesh lie downstream of whatever China builds on it. There is no water treaty between the two countries, only a consultative channel for flood season data that China has closed before.
- The Expert Level Mechanism is the channel that data comes through, and it commits China to nothing.
- Construction began in July 2025 on a dam Chinese analysts project at about 60 GW, three times the Three Gorges.
- Water may be diverted through a 40 km tunnel at the Great Bend, so India cannot judge the effect downstream.
- India's ask is regular sharing and a joint impact assessment, not exchanges only during a disaster.
- More than 14,000 glacial lakes dot the Tibetan Plateau, growing fastest near China's southern borders.
- A flood from one can reach the border in minutes, so upstream data is part of a warning system rather than a courtesy.
1997
UN Watercourses Convention; neither India nor China has joined
2002
Flood season memorandum on the Brahmaputra
2005
Flood season memorandum on the Sutlej
2017
China stops sharing Brahmaputra data during the Doklam standoff
What changed
6 Sep 2026
The Hindu, 6 Sep 2026
Background reading: The Indian Express, 7 Sep 2026: Two countries and a shared river: Mistrust is not inevitable (opens in a new tab)
Farakka Barrage
Copy link to Farakka BarragePrelims and Mains
On the Ganga, India is the upstream State and Bangladesh the downstream one, which is the relationship the Brahmaputra puts India on the other side of. The barrage at Farakka in West Bengal is where that position is exercised, by a structure built for a purpose inside India rather than for the border. Bihar, upstream of it, has a complaint of its own.
- The Farakka Barrage diverts Ganga water into the Bhagirathi–Hooghly to keep Kolkata port navigable.
- Bihar blames it for trapping silt upstream, a contested claim.
- The 1996 India–Bangladesh Ganga Water Sharing Treaty, which shares the lean season flow at Farakka, expires in December 2026.
What changed
12 Sep 2026
10 Sep 2026
28 Jul 2026Updatealso in news
- The 1996 treaty covers only sharing at Farakka, with an equal split when the flow falls below a set level, and Bangladesh's complaint is about its share in the dry season.
Brahmaputra Board
Copy link to Brahmaputra BoardPrelims and Mains
The Board was set up under the Brahmaputra Board Act, 1980 to prepare master plans for flood control, erosion and drainage, and remains advisory.
What changed
4 Aug 2026New subjectnewly added
- Of 73 master plans identified across the Brahmaputra, Barak and related basins, only 52 had been approved up to 2025, and 65 of 182 sanctioned technical posts were vacant.
- A North East Water Management Authority was first proposed in 2004 and a draft Bill was listed in Parliament in 2022, but it has not been enacted.
- Assam flooded in a season with a rainfall deficit, so flooding is tracking the condition of channels and embankments and not the quantity of rain.
Mains: these rivers cross several States and countries, yet flood management follows State boundaries because water is a State subject.
Indus Waters Treaty
Copy link to Indus Waters TreatyPrelims and Mains
The Chenab is a western river allotted to Pakistan, on which India may build only run of the river projects with little storage. India has held the treaty in abeyance since the Pahalgam attack, a step the treaty itself does not provide for.
What changed
21 Jul 2026New subject
- India is pushing hydropower projects of over 5,000 MW on the Chenab, including Sawalkote, Pakal Dul, Ratle, Kiru and Kwar, and seeks to renegotiate the treaty.
Cauvery and Mekedatu
Copy link to Cauvery and MekedatuPrelims and Mains
The Cauvery Water Management Authority implements the sharing of the river between Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Puducherry as fixed by the tribunal and modified by the Supreme Court in 2018, and Mekedatu is a dam Karnataka proposes on the river inside its own territory.
What changed
30 Jul 2026New subject
- The Cauvery Water Management Authority upheld a direction that Karnataka release 3,500 cusecs a day to Tamil Nadu.
- On Mekedatu the Centre told Parliament that the 2018 Supreme Court judgment does not require Karnataka to obtain other States' permission, but any revised project report needs appraisal by the Central Water Commission and the Authority's views.
Mains: Karnataka often meets the annual quantity but not the monthly schedule, so compliance figures and distress can both be true.
Mahanadi water dispute
Copy link to Mahanadi water disputePrelims and Mains
The Mahanadi dispute between Chhattisgarh and Odisha went to a tribunal set up in 2018 under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, and the States may instead settle it by negotiation.
What changed
30 Jul 2026New subject
- Chhattisgarh and Odisha have agreed to seek a negotiated settlement through a technical committee chaired by the Chairman of the Central Water Commission. The Mahanadi tribunal was set up in March 2018 under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956.