VidBodh AcademyThe art and science of civil services preparation

Why in news

Parliament passed the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2026, and the President gave assent on 13 August 2026. It creates a National Tribunals Commission to select the members of 16 tribunals, review their work and inquire into complaints against them. It came into force on 25 August.

Background

  • A tribunal is a body set up by law to decide disputes in a special field, such as service matters, tax, company law or the environment. It is meant to be quicker and more expert than a court.
  • The 42nd Amendment (1976) added Article 323A (administrative tribunals) and Article 323B (tribunals for other matters).
  • For a decade Parliament and the Supreme Court have gone back and forth. Parliament fixed short tenures and gave the executive a large say in selection; the Court struck the provisions down; Parliament passed them again.
  • On 19 November 2025 the Court held that the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 had re enacted what it had already struck down. The 2026 Act is Parliament's answer.

What the Act creates

  • The Commission: a Chairperson who is a former Supreme Court judge or former Chief Justice of a High Court, appointed after consulting the Chief Justice of India; two judicial and two technical members.
  • Its work: run selections, review the performance of tribunals, inquire into complaints, and keep a National Tribunals Data Grid.
  • Tenure: five years, up to the age of 70 for chairpersons and 67 for members, with reappointment allowed.
  • The Centre must appoint within three months of a recommendation.
  • The Act repeals the 2021 Act and saves appointments already made.
The National Tribunals Commission and its work, beside a timeline of the Supreme Court's rulings on tribunals from 1987 to 2025.
The National Tribunals Commission and its work, beside a timeline of the Supreme Court's rulings on tribunals from 1987 to 2025.Source: Tribunals Reforms Act, 2026; PRS Legislative Research

Does it meet the Court's test?

  • The Court has asked for three things: judges in the majority in selection, security of tenure, and freedom from the parent ministry.
  • For it: a single commission headed by a judge is what the Court itself suggested, and the tenure is now five years, not four.
  • Against it: a Union Secretary sits on each selection committee and the Centre makes the final appointment, while the Union is the largest litigant before these tribunals.
  • A performance review can become a lever over members if its data stays with the executive.

How it was passed

  • The Lok Sabha introduced and passed the Bill on the same day, without debate.
  • This matters because the earlier laws fell partly for want of engagement with the Court's directions.
  • A Standing Committee had reported days earlier on vacancies, notably in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the National Green Tribunal.

Cases to cite

  • S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India (1987): a tribunal can replace a High Court only if it is an equally effective alternative.
  • L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997): judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court is part of the basic structure; tribunal decisions go to a Division Bench of the High Court.
  • Union of India v. R. Gandhi (2010): tribunals must have the independence of the courts they replace.
  • Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank (2019): struck down the tribunal rules made under the Finance Act, 2017.
  • Madras Bar Association v. Union of India (2021 and 2025): struck down the four year tenure and the minimum age of 50; the 2025 ruling held that Parliament cannot re-enact a provision without curing the defect.

The way forward

  • Give the Commission its own budget and secretariat, outside the ministries whose orders the tribunals review.
  • Place the Data Grid in the public domain.
  • Fill vacancies before they arise, by starting selection six months ahead.
  • Review whether every tribunal is needed; where a High Court bench would serve, merge or wind up.

Prelims facts

  • Articles 323A and 323B were inserted by the 42nd Amendment, 1976.
  • Article 323A tribunals can be set up only by Parliament; Article 323B tribunals by Parliament or a State legislature.
  • National Tribunals Commission: Chairperson, two judicial and two technical members.
  • Tenure under the 2026 Act: five years; age limit 70 (chairperson) and 67 (member).
  • The Central Administrative Tribunal was set up in 1985.