2026 · Q10
Consider the following statements about the Rigvedic period:
- I.Irrigation from wells allowed agriculture to expand away from flood plains and strips on river margins into the present Punjab and Haryana plains having underground water levels reasonably close to the surface.
- II.Draught-animal power was employed to draw up water out of the wells.
Which of the following information support/supports the above statements?
- 1.There is evidence in the Rigveda of the use of ashma chakra (stone pulley wheel) and ahava (strapped wooden pails) to draw up water.
- 2.Mention has been made in the Rigveda of the use of implements like parashu/kulisha (axe) and datra/sreni (sickle).
- 3.There is a history of the use of ox, even before the Rigveda, for ploughing the land and pulling the carts.
- (a)1 and 2 only
- (b)1, 2 and 3
- (c)1 and 3 only
- (d)3 only
Show answer and explanationHide answer and explanation
- Item 1 supports both statements directly, because a stone pulley wheel and strapped pails are the physical apparatus of well lifting, which is the technology that makes cultivation away from the river margin possible and which also needs a source of pulling power.
- Item 3 supports statement II, since the established use of the ox for ploughing and for drawing carts before and during the Rigvedic period is exactly the draught-animal power that could be transferred to lifting water from a well.
- Item 2 supports neither statement and is the eliminator. An axe is a tool for clearing forest and a sickle is a harvesting implement, so both relate to the land use cycle but tell us nothing about wells or about animal power applied to water lifting. Hence 1 and 3 support the statements and (c) is correct. (a) and (b) admit the irrelevant implements item, and (d) discards the pulley and pail evidence, which is the single most direct piece of support in the set.
Moderate · Static · Ancient and Medieval History · Prehistory, Harappan and Vedic India